The news, 365 days behind — on purpose Delayed live · replaying 2025

One Year Ago.AI

Remember how fast this is.

17APR2025replayed
one year on
model launchGoogle · Gemini

Google launches Gemini 2.5 Flash with controllable thinking budgets in preview

The new model lets developers toggle thinking on or off and set a thinking budget, promising a cost-efficient alternative to its bigger sibling and other leading models.

Google today released an early preview of Gemini 2.5 Flash, the company’s first model with fully controllable reasoning. Announced via the Google Developers Blog by Director of Product Management Tulsee Doshi, the model is available in the Gemini API through Google AI Studio and Vertex AI.

Doshi describes 2.5 Flash as a ‘hybrid reasoning model’ that lets developers toggle thinking on or off, and set a thinking budget of up to 24,576 tokens for the reasoning phase. The model is trained to decide how long to think per prompt, using the full budget only when needed. With thinking set to zero, it maintains speeds comparable to 2.0 Flash while still offering improved performance. Google claims 2.5 Flash sits second only to 2.5 Pro on LMArena’s Hard Prompts benchmark, at a fraction of the cost.

The Hacker News thread that accompanied the launch — 1076 points and 560 comments — captured an industry in flux. Multiple users report cancelling Anthropic subscriptions in favor of Gemini, citing better reasoning and less sycophantic behavior. But the sentiment is far from unanimous: while developers praise Gemini’s architectural insight, many still prefer Claude for hands-on coding and agentic tasks, and some complain about the Gemini web app’s reliability. The thread captures a moment where the cost-performance frontier is shifting, and no single provider has locked down developer loyalty.

H
HN user zoogeny

Calls Gemini 2.5 Pro a step up from the free models they've used before, praising its willingness to push back rather than obsequiously agree.

H
HN user jeeeb

Cancelled Claude subscription after side-by-side coding comparisons, says Gemini now his go-to.

H
HN user blueyes

Acknowledges Anthropic's Claude Code tooling is still superior for file manipulation and syntax fixing.

H
HN user bayarearefugee

Switched from Claude to Gemini, saying Claude 3.7 overengineers far beyond what's asked.

H
HN user mamp

Finds Gemini better for architectural discussions in Rust, but Claude stronger for hands-on coding.

H
HN user onlyrealcuzzo

Thinks Google has pulled ahead of Anthropic with 2.5 Pro, though notes it is slower than Claude 3.7.

H
HN user energy123

Criticizes the Gemini web app as slow and buggy, while AI Studio fares better.

One year later — open only if you can handle spoilers

Gemini 2.5 Flash went on to become one of the most widely adopted cost-efficient reasoning models of 2025, with its thinking budget approach later emulated by OpenAI and Anthropic. Google's bet on controllable reasoning helped it capture significant share of the developer API market by year-end, though Claude Code remained the gold standard for agentic workflows well into 2026.

Replay thisPost on XRedditHNLinkedIn

The Weekly Replay · free by email

This week, one year ago — every Sunday.

One email each Sunday: the week's replayed AI news, with the one-year-later annotations included. Written like it's breaking — dated like it isn't.

Free · double opt-in · unsubscribe anytime · privacy